With Netball taking over as the main focus sport next term
within the School I work, I felt it necessary to make a review of the current
literature regarding injury prevention in Netball players
Proactive or reactive
Netball involves rapid
acceleration, deceleration, and directional changes which place considerable
forces through articular and periarticular structures, similar to other field
and court sports 1. A high rate of overuse injuries occur among both elite
and amateur players; lower back, ankle, knee and the shoulder are sites of the
most consistent injuries, with injuries from the lower limbs coming from
repeated impacts with hard surfaces during landing, hopping and, to a lesser
degree, when pivoting. Young people especially are at particular risk of sports
injury because of high levels of exposure at a time of major physiological
change 2. Although fewer lower-limb injuries occur in junior players 3,
incidence of injuries from falls at 35% suggests that such injuries could be
due to poor balance or a lack of other key movement skills 4.
It is important
therefore to understand the frequency and nature of sports injuries at the
youth level to assist in the development of effective injury prevention
strategies. Once again the role of any Strength & Conditioning/athletic
development coach is to get the athlete fit and ready to take the field of
play.
Even national squad multi-disciplined teams have confessed to
being reactive rather than proactive with regards to the injury
prevention/strength & conditioning programme of its Netball structure 5.
Previous attempts of being proactive include the use of ankle or knee guards but
without a detailed strength and conditioning programme alongside; this shows a
lazy approach to injury prevention. The evidence is uncertain regarding the use
of knee braces, although there is some evidence from cadaver studies that knee
bracing does offer protection to knee ligaments under external load 6.
This effect may not carry over to the high-velocity, multidirectional forces
encountered during sporting activity, such as Netball. What is becoming clear
is that there is significant and consistent evidence in the literature to
support the use of injury-prevention strategies in adolescents that include
preseason conditioning as well as functional training, education, strength and
balance programmes that are continued throughout the playing season 7.
Screening
The effects of screening
players, both before and throughout the season has several advantages;
highlighting injury risk of players, physiological imbalances and the progress
of fitness development. In addition, the act of screening players can develop
self-evaluation/awareness of their own anatomy, body mechanics and the purpose
of specific aspects of their training.
Upon working with a
handful of Netball players this term; some were unable to control a basic lunge
or squat movement under body weight conditions, yet were loading these
movements in a gym situation. This caused compensation strategies and
accentuated stress on areas of relative flexibility, where injuries appeared. By
screening these elements separately, it is possible to demonstrate to players
and coaching personal the reasons for these problems, as well as laying
foundations for the changes that would be necessary to overcome them. An example
of a progressive screening could be: Single leg balance-single leg
squat-dynamic hopping with turning in the air. This example looks to screen for
possible knee ligament tear/sprains of which are consistent with an inability
to counterbalance external torque/rotation when landing or pivoting.
Hypermobility
Hypermobility or generalised joint laxity is defined as a
condition in which most of an individual’s synovial joints have a range of
motion beyond normal limits. The prevalence of hypermobility in schoolchildren
has been estimated to be 13–27%8, with a higher prevalence
in girls than boys 9. In some sports, hypermobile joints may be associated with a
performance advantage—for example, spin bowlers in cricket, gymnasts, and
ballerinas. However, previous studies have revealed an increased incidence of
musculoskeletal complaints such as arthralgias, joint subluxations, joint
dislocations, and sprains in sportsmen with hypermobile joints 10.
Hypermobility in the knee joint-a risk factor for potential knee ligament injuries |
The Beighton index gives an
overall composite score of 0–9 with regards to joint hypermobility and can also
be categorised into three groups: 0–2 (not hypermobile); 3–4 (moderately hypermobile); 5–9 (distinctly hypermobile) 11. Not surprising that
the indices of injury rates increase alongside the increase in the Beighton
index. But researchers still argue whether this is a cause or effect scenario
due to the cross sectional method of most of the research. What seems to be
more conclusive is that patients with hypermobility syndrome have been shown to
have impaired joint proprioception in both the knee and finger joints 12.
This impaired proprioception may not just account for an increase in acute
injuries, but may also explain the increased incidence of secondary degenerative
osteoarthritis seen in hypermobile joints 13.
Risk factors for Netball related injuries
Not warming up before
a game.
A simple precaution but still not adhered to by some coaches. One study found
that only 60% of netballers reported warming up before training and the game! Previous
studies have shown that the range of movement of a joint can be different
before and after a warm up 14. This is very important when you
consider the amount of joint related injuries in Netball. Participants who reported training for at least 4 h/week had
significantly fewer injures than those who trained for <4 h/week 15.
However, it should be noted that the quality of training should always outweigh
the quantity of it.
Although disagreement still surrounds the most effective warm up
for Netball, and indeed most sports, I have included some necessary key points
when designing any warm up:
- Make it fun
- Include multi
directional changes of direction
- Provide an environment for players to
develop decision making-don’t just go through the routine
- Mimic the sport to
a degree in the warm up; if you’re preparing for a rugby game-contact has to be
essential. Cricket = catching and throwing the ball from a variety of different
body positions
Conclusion
Injury prevention
strategies should seek to reduce the incidence of common injuries in netball by
gaining and understanding the mechanisms associated with each of these
injuries. Training programs should be specific to netball and focus on demands
of the games. Skills and movement patterns of individual positions during game
play should form the basis of these programs. All injury prevention programs,
resources and strategies should be produced in formats that encourage coaches
and players from all levels of competition to take them up. It may also be
appropriate to investigate if injury prevention models that have proven
effective in other sports could be extrapolated to netball. Lastly, education,
both from a coach and player perspective, is vital if injury prevention
programmes are going to be successful in the long term.
References
1.
Smith, R., Damodaran, A. K., Swaminathan, S., Campbell, R.,
Barnsley, L. (2005). Hypermobility and sports injuries in junior netball
players. British Journal of Sports Medicine,
39(9), 628–631.
2.
Lidqvist, K. S., Timpka, T., Bjurulf, P. (1996) Injuries during
leisure physical activity in a Swedish municipality. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 24, 282–92.
3.
Finch, C., Valuri, G., Ozanne-Smith, J. (1998). Sport and active
recreation injuries in Australia: evidence from emergency department
presentations. British Journal of Sports
Medicine, 32(3), 220–225.
4.
Routley, V. (1991).Sports
injuries in children-the five most commonly presented sports. Hazard, 9,1–8.
5.
Elphinstona, J & Hardman, S. L. (2006). Effect of an integrated
functional stability program on injury rates in an international netball squad.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,
9(1), 169—176.
6.
Paulos, L. E., Cawley, P. W., France, E. P. (1991). Impact
biomechanics of lateral knee bracing. The anterior cruciate ligament. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(4),
337–342.
7.
Abernethy, L., & Bleakley, C. (2007). Strategies to prevent
injury in adolescent sport: a systematic review. British
Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(10), 627–638.
8.
Van der Giessen, L. J., Liekins, D., Rutgers, K. J. (2001).
Validation of Beighton score and prevalence of connective tissue signs in 773 Dutch
children. The Journal of Rheumatology, 28,
2726–2730.
9.
Larsson, L. G., Baum, J., Mudholkar, G. S. (1987). Hypermobility:
features and differential incidence between the sexes. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 30(12), 1426–1430.
10. Finsterbush, A.,
Pogrund, H. (1982). The hypermobility syndrome: musculoskeletal complaints in
100 consecutive cases of generalized joint hypermobility. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 168, 124–127.
11. Boyle, K. L., Witt, P., Riegger-Krugh, C.
(2003). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Beighton and Horan joint
mobility index. Journal of Athletic
Training, 38(4),
281–285.
12. Hall, M. G., Ferrell,
W. R., Sturrock, R. D., et al. (1995). The effect of the hypermobility syndrome
on knee joint proprioception. British Journal of
Rheumatology, 34(2), 121–125.
13. Jonsson, H.,
Valtysdottir, S. T., Kjartansson, O., et al. (1996). Hypermobility associated
with osteoarthritis of the thumb base: a clinical and radiological subset of a
hand osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 55, 540–543.
14. Bird, H. A. (2004). Rheumatological
aspects of dance. The Journal of
Rheumatology, 31, 12–13.
15. McManus, A.,
Stevenson, M. R., & Finch, C.F. (2006). Incidence and risk factors for
injury in non-elite netball. Journal of
Science and Medicine in Sport, 9(1-2), 119—124.